Greg said:
I would suspect that the previous install was faulty as when Subaru replaced
my left front at 80K and the replacement lasted only 20k more, just enough
Hi,
Please let me ask a stupid question: does Subaru NOT believe in grease
in their wheel bearings?
Here's why I ask--
I see lots of stories and tech bulletins and so forth about Subie wheel
bearing issues. I won't get into what IMO is the ridiculous idea of
continuing to use ball bearings in apps where rollers have proven to be
more appropriate, but will relate my own anecdotal experience.
My '90 Loyale 4wd wagon has rollers in the back, balls in the front. I
bought it used with 209k miles, and the previous owner was less than
religious about his maintenance. The owner's manual specs wheel bearing
inspections and regreasing as necessary at 60k mi (approx 100k km)
intervals. Being a bit of a dummy, I didn't catch that, so it was at
over 300k miles when I started getting a little play in the right rear
wheel and inspected the bearings. That RR bearing was bone dry, to the
point of having that "red rust dust" coming out. The LR had only a tiny
bit of grease, both the fronts "enough" but hardly "too much." Compared
to other cars I've worked on with similar mileage, all of these bearings
appeared to have been "underlubed" from the start.
I added grease to all four, made a note to replace the dry one ASAP and
went on. Well, "ASAP" turned into 10k miles plus before the bearing
actually broke but even so I limped home on it. I replaced it at home,
using "homemade" tools, and later replaced the fronts "just cuz" when I
replaced axles. They weren't noisy, didn't have any play, but the front
end was half apart anyway, so might as well do it all at once. The LR is
still doing fine. The car now has 343k miles.
All this makes the idea of distorted housings and all that, while not
impossible, perhaps improbable compared to the possibility of inadequate
lubrication even on new cars or those replacement installations where it
is warned NOT to add grease to whatever comes in the package.
Any thoughts?
Rick