Octane grade for Subarus

Cameo said:
Do Subarus need premium gas to run?
Some do, some don't. My 2000 Forester 169k miles gets by on regular. I had
a 1985 4WD Turbo that needed premium and 20W50 oil! My 1992 Loyale needed
premium when it got old around 150k miles and after.
 
Tim Conway said:
Some do, some don't. My 2000 Forester 169k miles gets by on regular.
I had a 1985 4WD Turbo that needed premium and 20W50 oil! My 1992
Loyale needed premium when it got old around 150k miles and after.

I wonder what octane ratings are specified in the Owner's Manual of the
latest Legacy and Impreza models (2010 & 2011.)
 
Tim Conway said:
Thanks for the link. That's cool. The Legacy 2.5i and the 3.6R both
require regular 87 while the 2.5 GT requires premium 93. I want one.
Maybe a 3.6R. <g>

Thanks indeed! I wonder where GT owners find 93 octane gas though. The 3
grades I see around are 87, 89 and 91 octane.
 
Dean Hoffman said:
Remember the old days when one could just retard the timing a bit
to get rid of engine ping? A timing light and a wrench to loosen
the distributor were standard tools. So was a matchbook to set the
point and spark plug gap.

I wouldn't want to date myself that far back. ;-)
 
Remember the old days when one could just retard the timing a bit to get
rid of engine ping? A timing light and a wrench to loosen the
distributor were standard tools. So was a matchbook to set the point and
spark plug gap.

You got me looking in the bottom of my garage tool box.
Wonder what a timing light and dwell/tach meter are good for these days?
I've also got the old gauge for setting plug gaps which is still good
for my garden equipment.
 
"Cameo" wrote in message
Tim Conway said:
Thanks for the link. That's cool. The Legacy 2.5i and the 3.6R both
require regular 87 while the 2.5 GT requires premium 93. I want one.
Maybe a 3.6R. <g>

Thanks indeed! I wonder where GT owners find 93 octane gas though. The 3
grades I see around are 87, 89 and 91 octane.

The difference between US and UK fuels' octane rating is interesting.
Our standard supermarket low octane petrol is rated at 95 octane.
We also have 99 octane fuel (+5% bio fuel) easily available which I run my
WRX
on and yes, it does make a difference. Most noticeable is much smoother
running and acceleration from low revs. An overall better performance,
lower consumption and no residue build-up is claimed. On one of the rare
occasions I monitored fuel consumption on a long run I averaged 34 mpg
which surprised the hell out of me!!

-C-
Anything is possible if you don't
know what you're talking about
 
     Remember the old days when one could just retard the timing a bit
to get rid of engine ping?    A timing light and a wrench to loosen the
distributor were standard tools.   So was a matchbook to set the point
and spark plug gap.

I've set a few that way...

My 2003 H6 3 liter outback runs best on 93, if you dump in 87 it
detects the ping and retards the timing.


Dave
 
I've set a few that way...

My 2003 H6 3 liter outback runs best on 93, if you dump in 87 it
detects the ping and retards the timing.

Dave

Same here. Indeed some folks say they've done the math both ways and
the decreased mileage when running low octane fuel defeats any cost
savings. Thayt may not be true for all cars or driving styles.
 
The majority of cars that "require" premium fuel do just fine without
it. Are people so gullible to think their car won't run on regular
fuel? What if there was none available in the sticks? Use regular and
save a lot a money!
 
The majority of cars that "require" premium fuel do just fine without
it. Are people so gullible to think their car won't run on regular
fuel? What if there was none available in the sticks? Use regular and
save a lot a money!

That's fine with newer cars that automatically adjust the timing with lower
octane fuel. Older cars using below spec fuels can damage the engine with
knocking etc. They will run, but won't be good for the engine.
 
The majority of cars that "require" premium fuel do just fine without
it.  Are people so gullible to think their car won't run on regular
fuel?  What if there was none available in the sticks? Use regular and
save a lot a money!

Yes, most engines equipped with knock sensors or otherwise adjusted
for lower octane will safely run.

But, there are multiple sources of information about tests that
definitively show a DECREASE in fuel efficiency when cars DESIGNED to
utilize high octane fuel are operated with low octane fuel.
Autohaus,wikipedia, Lexus ,edmunds, CNN, etc. basically, retarding the
timing on ANY car will reduce fuel efficiency. And this is how a
vehicle designed for high octane must deal with lower octane to avoid
potential damage from knock - by retarding the timing.

HOWEVER, if your car is designed for low octane(and has no
modifications or problems) - there is absolutely NO advantage to
running high octane fuel.

Check your manual. Trust me, Subaru engineers would LOVE to tell you
your car is designed for low octane, they'd get fewer complaints about
the expense of operating the car. But high compression engines are
less efficient on low octane than the high octane they are designed to
use. You will also enjoy better responsiveness/power using what your
manual suggests.
 
HOWEVER, if your car is designed for low octane(and has no
modifications or problems) - there is absolutely NO advantage to
running high octane fuel.

Check your manual. Trust me, Subaru engineers would LOVE to tell you
your car is designed for low octane, they'd get fewer complaints about
the expense of operating the car. But high compression engines are
less efficient on low octane than the high octane they are designed to
use. You will also enjoy better responsiveness/power using what your
manual suggests.

My 2008 STi will not run well on regular fuel. The book says 93 octane
and allows for 91 if you have to, but warns of poor performance. I've
tried both. Mileage and performance are MUCH better with the 93. The
car isn't really supposed to be an economical vehicle to drive, but what
are you going to do if you want the kind of punch and power a
turbo-charged 340 whp torque monster can deliver. I LOVE this car!
David
 
My 2008 STi will not run well on regular fuel.  The book says 93 octane
and allows for 91 if you have to, but warns of poor performance.  I've
tried both.  Mileage and performance are MUCH better with the 93.  The
car isn't really supposed to be an economical vehicle to drive, but what
are you going to do if you want the kind of punch and power a
turbo-charged 340 whp torque monster can deliver.  I LOVE this car!
David



Cool. I love my 06 WRX wagon. It's plenty fast enough for an old guy
and it's DL so no problems from cops, kids wanting to race etc. I
ALMOST got an STi but really didn't need the higher insurance. Plus, i
wanted a wagon.

I read where Toyota's 'Lexus College' in Japan tested one of their
vehicles and it dropped 6mpg switching from the recommended high
octane to low.
 
David said:
My 2008 STi will not run well on regular fuel. The book says 93
octane and allows for 91 if you have to, but warns of poor
performance. I've tried both. Mileage and performance are MUCH
better with the 93. The car isn't really supposed to be an economical
vehicle to drive, but what are you going to do if you want the kind of
punch and power a turbo-charged 340 whp torque monster can deliver. I
LOVE this car!

Where do you find 93 octane gas? Here in the Puget Sound area the
highest octane gas I find is 92.
 
Cameo said:
Where do you find 93 octane gas? Here in the Puget Sound area the highest
octane gas I find is 92.

I think Amoco used to have 93, but I haven't seen one of them around here in
;a long time (south central PA).
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
13,968
Messages
67,564
Members
7,450
Latest member
Ken43

Latest Threads

Back
Top