D
dan_m
Has anyone driven one of these puppies and willing to comment?
thx. =)
thx. =)
N
Nicolas Dore
dan_m said:
Hello!
I attended Subaru Canada's test drive in Montreal 3 weeks ago and the
main things I noticed: The turbo has some lag, nothing you couldn't
manage with an MT and experience but annoying with an AT (all test
cars were ATs), when the boost comes it is brutal
, the carhandles well but is limited by its tires, the ride is much better than
my 2000 L Wagon and the interior is WAY better, a much more
contemporary design, much better materials and fit and finish. The
exterior is nice but looks like what it is, an evolution of the
previous model.
My 2 cents, hope this helps.
Nicolas
V
Voja
I was at Vancouver test drive last week. Beside what Nicolas said I
liked steering wheel shifter. This is really nice touch for those who like
to have control over transmission.
Excellent instrument panel. I liked the color scheme (light blue numbers
with red dials and black background). Also when you put the ignition
key and
just before you start the engine dials go all the way to the end (kind
of POST - power on self test) and all lights are on.
Very quite engine while idling (at least for now 1,250 km on my test car).
Since this was Legacy and I'm driving Outback I've noticed those few
inches difference (ground clearance) when entering/exiting car, but it
doesn't matter.
Acceleration was awesome. Yes, there was a lag but once it (engine)
crosses 2,000~2,200 rpm it accelerates like a space shuttle.
Brakes seems to be better, too. Guys at the test drive were mentioning
something that balances weight when braking sharply so that nose of the car
doesn't dive and that rear wheels have more grip. This explains less
braking distance then my Outback 2002.
All in all I was impressed but not as much as I was when I got my
Outback.
Voja
liked steering wheel shifter. This is really nice touch for those who like
to have control over transmission.
Excellent instrument panel. I liked the color scheme (light blue numbers
with red dials and black background). Also when you put the ignition
key and
just before you start the engine dials go all the way to the end (kind
of POST - power on self test) and all lights are on.
Very quite engine while idling (at least for now 1,250 km on my test car).
Since this was Legacy and I'm driving Outback I've noticed those few
inches difference (ground clearance) when entering/exiting car, but it
doesn't matter.
Acceleration was awesome. Yes, there was a lag but once it (engine)
crosses 2,000~2,200 rpm it accelerates like a space shuttle.
Brakes seems to be better, too. Guys at the test drive were mentioning
something that balances weight when braking sharply so that nose of the car
doesn't dive and that rear wheels have more grip. This explains less
braking distance then my Outback 2002.
All in all I was impressed but not as much as I was when I got my
Outback.
Voja
B
BSackamano
I haven't driven it, but I plan to. It's a beautiful car.
BSackamano
'03 WRX
BSackamano
'03 WRX
W
worzacct
Took a 2005 Legacy GT Limited with manual transmission for a test
drive last week. I was really impressed -- I didn't notice any turbo
lag with the manual transmission. Perhaps the new electronic throttle
control system helps it to feel more responsive. I have driven
several WRX's in the past, but the new Legacy GT with its 2.5 liter
engine seemed to respond quicker even with a slightly increased
pressure on the gas pedal. Only went for about a 25 minute drive in
the city and never got over about 60 mph on one road, but it sure felt
nice. The most difficult thing would be adjusting my driving habits
to all that power -- my wife was along on the test drive and she said
that she felt like she had whiplash from the acceleration.
Can't wait to buy a Legacy GT in a year or two -- besides the great
performance, the interior is much improved. I really also like the
fact that you can get a Legacy GT without all the expensive options
such as leather and a moonroof. Those options are available in the GT
Limited, but at least you have the option to get the performance
without all the luxury.
We are on our fourth Subaru now -- I drive a 92 SVX and my wife drives
a 2000 Outback wagon 4-cylinder with automatic. The 2000 Outback has
63,000 miles and the only thing that has been repaired (other than
normal service) was a bad sparkplug after the 30,000 mile service.
drive last week. I was really impressed -- I didn't notice any turbo
lag with the manual transmission. Perhaps the new electronic throttle
control system helps it to feel more responsive. I have driven
several WRX's in the past, but the new Legacy GT with its 2.5 liter
engine seemed to respond quicker even with a slightly increased
pressure on the gas pedal. Only went for about a 25 minute drive in
the city and never got over about 60 mph on one road, but it sure felt
nice. The most difficult thing would be adjusting my driving habits
to all that power -- my wife was along on the test drive and she said
that she felt like she had whiplash from the acceleration.
Can't wait to buy a Legacy GT in a year or two -- besides the great
performance, the interior is much improved. I really also like the
fact that you can get a Legacy GT without all the expensive options
such as leather and a moonroof. Those options are available in the GT
Limited, but at least you have the option to get the performance
without all the luxury.
We are on our fourth Subaru now -- I drive a 92 SVX and my wife drives
a 2000 Outback wagon 4-cylinder with automatic. The 2000 Outback has
63,000 miles and the only thing that has been repaired (other than
normal service) was a bad sparkplug after the 30,000 mile service.