R
R Jacobs
Last fall I bought a 2004 Manual Outback after test driving the 2003.
Relative to the 2003, the clutch was rougher. More importantly, the
car lurches its passengers forward whenever letting up on the gas -
especially in lower gears, as in stop-and-go traffic. The kids were
getting motion sick! Our interpretation is that the fuel mapping has
changed - and fuel is cut off too quickly when the driver lets up on
the accelerator. Furthermore, the mileage is much poorer than the
literature would suggest. We got 8-9 km/l on the highway, but the
specs suggest 11 km/l. I've not before encountered such a large
discrepancy between promise and reality in mileage.
Our dealer was very sympathetic, and attempted multiple tweaks in the
shop- but ultimately, we drew in customer relations at Subaru Canada.
Although they initially acknowledged there was a "driveability
problem" with the 2004, and they knew there was a "fix in the works",
they left the dealer to their own resources to resolve our problems.
Ultimately we moved to an automatic, paid the difference, and a little
more for "wear and tear". The dealer likely made no money on the deal.
They unloaded the car on a jeep owner who likely spends little time in
stop-and-go traffic. Overall, having the manufacturer leave the table,
after acknowledging a problem has me loose confidence in the product.
Has anyone else had similar observations with fuel mapping or
mileage, specific to the 2004 Outback?
Relative to the 2003, the clutch was rougher. More importantly, the
car lurches its passengers forward whenever letting up on the gas -
especially in lower gears, as in stop-and-go traffic. The kids were
getting motion sick! Our interpretation is that the fuel mapping has
changed - and fuel is cut off too quickly when the driver lets up on
the accelerator. Furthermore, the mileage is much poorer than the
literature would suggest. We got 8-9 km/l on the highway, but the
specs suggest 11 km/l. I've not before encountered such a large
discrepancy between promise and reality in mileage.
Our dealer was very sympathetic, and attempted multiple tweaks in the
shop- but ultimately, we drew in customer relations at Subaru Canada.
Although they initially acknowledged there was a "driveability
problem" with the 2004, and they knew there was a "fix in the works",
they left the dealer to their own resources to resolve our problems.
Ultimately we moved to an automatic, paid the difference, and a little
more for "wear and tear". The dealer likely made no money on the deal.
They unloaded the car on a jeep owner who likely spends little time in
stop-and-go traffic. Overall, having the manufacturer leave the table,
after acknowledging a problem has me loose confidence in the product.
Has anyone else had similar observations with fuel mapping or
mileage, specific to the 2004 Outback?