ON Topic: 88 Supra overheating...

  • Thread starter Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B
  • Start date
The coolant in the bottle looked OK. The coolant in the
radiator...couldn't be seen. It must have blown a lot of it out. Last time
it took a quart.

I have a new SPI radiator (I know, I know, but it was $123 compared to
$487!) so I'll remove the rad, drain and flush the cooling system, and
then replace and refill, and cross my fingers...

And, of course, after being nice yesterday and today, it's going to rain
all weekend, and then be really nice for the next four days after...

Haven't you heard that old question:

What do you get after two days of rain?

Monday.
 
It's not the PH it is checking

yes it is dude. the solution is classic bromothymol blue - starts blue,
turns yellow if the gasket is failing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromothymol_blue

[now you can reconsider paying $50 for a bottle of reagent that only
really should be costing you a couple of bucks.]

works because the COâ‚‚ in combustion product [about 15%] bubbles through
the coolant, dissolves and forms carbonic acid, and reduces the pH.

"solutions of carbon dioxide in water"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonic_acid

- so having changed the coolant 2
weeks ago will have NO effect on the test.

two weeks, true. but having changed it sooner can mask the problem,
particularly in early stages where gas leakage can be slight.
 
I know there are techs in all three groups, hence the cross posting....

The other day, the day it got clobbered by the storm, it was 96 degrees in
Keene NH. That's ~35 miles from home. Since it was nice I decided to take
the roof off the Supra and use it for my daily rounds.

Everything was fine until about mile 27, and then I noticed the temp
climbing. By the time I got to my first stop it was almost to the red.

It behaved the rest of the time in Keene, and then, about 27 miles later
it was heating up again.

I opened the radiator and it was down about a quart, but the bottle was on
"low". I filled the radiator and let it sit for a couple rainy days.

Today was bright and sunny and about 86 degrees, so, since the roof
doesn't *quite* fit as well after making like a kite it sits in the trunk,
and again the ~35 mile trip to Keene. 27 miles up the road...almost in the
red again. When I got to where I pick up my parts I let it cool and then
opened the hood, and in front of the radiator the shroud attached to the
bottom of the car was wet, and the overflow bottle was FULL. Spring a
leak? I patched one split in the plastic top a couple years ago, and it
had sprung again. When I filled it I did not add any to the bottle.

It ran OK for the few stops I had, then back home...27 miles...

When I got home I left the heat on and would start it, ramp the non
eletric fan up and shut it down. After about 1/2 an hour letting it sit, I
went out and gingerly removed the radiator cap. The cap was COOL! Again...
down about a quart in the readiator, but this time the bottle was full.

I am guessing the radiator is plugged up. It is the original 22 year old
radiator, so I ordered a new one. From Toyota? HAH! Even though they last
+20 years, they are also FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY SEVEN DOLLARS!!!

SPI, $130. It may only last seven years, but then, how much longer will
the car last? (Although it is in pretty good shape...)

BTW, I had the SAME THING happen to my '89 Subaru GL coupe, and after
replacing the radiator I don't even need the fan, the thing runs so cool.
T-Stat?
 
The sound you just heard was my bubble bursting...

I have a new radiator. If the rain holds off this weekend I'll put it in
(it was needed anyway...) and then take it for a spin. It takes over 25
miles for the engine to start to creep up in temp.

Yeah, I think a new HG is in order...I'm hoping I can get through this
summer OK and do it over the winter.

If the head gasket is leaking and you value the engine AT ALL - DO NOT
continue driving it.
You WILL cause further damage. Ride your bicycle for a week - a head
gasket replacement on even a 7MGE is only a good day's work for a
decent do-it-yourselfer. Add a day for the machine shop to check (and
possibly plane) the head and you should be able to do it over 3 days -
working evenings.
 
It's not the PH it is checking

yes it is dude. the solution is classic bromothymol blue - starts blue,
turns yellow if the gasket is failing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromothymol_blue

[now you can reconsider paying $50 for a bottle of reagent that only
really should be costing you a couple of bucks.]

works because the CO2 in combustion product [about 15%] bubbles through
the coolant, dissolves and forms carbonic acid, and reduces the pH.

"solutions of carbon dioxide in water"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonic_acid

- so having changed the coolant 2
weeks ago will have NO effect on the test.

two weeks, true. but having changed it sooner can mask the problem,
particularly in early stages where gas leakage can be slight.

Not the stuff I've used over the last 30 years. It was accurate even
when the pH was way high.

OK - I checket out your reference - it is NOT checking the pH of the
coolant. It is detecting CO2 by bubbling air from the cooling system
through the reagent (which you have correctly identified) and if the
air contains CO2 it is absorbed in the water the reagent is disolved
in, forming carbonic acid, and changing the colour of the fluid.

From your reference-
Bromothymol blue is mostly used in measuring substances that would
have relatively low acidic or basic levels (near a neutral pH). It is
often used in managing the pH of pools and fish tanks, and for
measuring the presence of carbonic acid in a liquid.

A common demonstration of BTB's pH indicator properties involves
exhaling through a tube into a neutral solution of BTB. As carbon
dioxide is absorbed from the breath into the solution, forming
carbonic acid, the solution changes color from green to yellow. Thus,
BTB is commonly used in middle school science classes to demonstrate
that the more that muscles are used, the greater the CO2 output.

From the instructios for the leak detector kit-
To do the test, add the blue detector fluid to the (block-tester)
plastic container according to the directions, and place it onto the
radiator filler neck. The squeeze bulb is placed on top of the
reservoir and squeezed repeatedly (Some block testers, have a tube
that connects to a vacuum line instead of a squeeze bulb). Squeezing
the bulb will draw air from the radiator through the test fluid. Block
tester fluid is normally blue. Exhaust gases in the cooling system
will change the color of the fluid to yellow, indicating a combustion
leak. If the fluid remains blue, exhaust gases were not present during
the test. The vehicle should be started and at operating temperature
before performing the test. Vehicles with head gasket leaks may
overheat, and purge hot water and steam out of the radiator. Perform
this test, at your own risk, and do not do the test, unless you are
experienced and are wearing clothing and equipment to protect you from
burns, or injury.
 
Haven't you heard that old question:

What do you get after two days of rain?

Monday.

But it didn't! I looked for tools, opened the hood. Looked for more tools,
undid the bolts holding the shroud on the bottom. Found some tools, undid
the hoses. Then had a coffee and a cig, undid some more bolts, looked for
more tools, sprayed the bolts with penetrating oil, had another cig, undid
the shroud, and of course, broke an ear off it removing it, yanked the old
one, put in the new one, went grocery shopping, redid the hoses (after
chanting "replace the bottom hose first" 50 times), filled it, had another
cig and coffee and then had supper.

Going to get a t-stat and cap from Toyota Monday, and then test it out.
 
So, uh, have you taken a whiff of the expansion bottle yet? It only takes
seconds to do that, and the result could change the entire tendency of
this thread...

So I took it out of the garage, moved it to my work apron out back, had it
running for about 7 minutes. Opened the bottle and took a good whiff...

What does it mean if it smells like exhaust...? :(
 
get one of those chemical leak test kits. the pH of the coolant changes
if the gasket is leaking - provided you haven't masked it by changing
the coolant too recently.
It's not the PH it is checking

yes it is dude. the solution is classic bromothymol blue - starts blue,
turns yellow if the gasket is failing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromothymol_blue

[now you can reconsider paying $50 for a bottle of reagent that only
really should be costing you a couple of bucks.]

works because the CO2 in combustion product [about 15%] bubbles through
the coolant, dissolves and forms carbonic acid, and reduces the pH.

"solutions of carbon dioxide in water"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonic_acid

- so having changed the coolant 2
weeks ago will have NO effect on the test.

two weeks, true. but having changed it sooner can mask the problem,
particularly in early stages where gas leakage can be slight.

Not the stuff I've used over the last 30 years. It was accurate even
when the pH was way high.

OK - I checket out your reference - it is NOT checking the pH of the
coolant.

you can use it either way. if the system is bubbling, then the gasket
is leaking. and don't need a reagent to tell you that!

otoh, if you use the reagent to test the coolant, and you can, then you
have your result.

It is detecting CO2 by bubbling air from the cooling system
through the reagent (which you have correctly identified) and if the
air contains CO2 it is absorbed in the water the reagent is disolved
in, forming carbonic acid, and changing the colour of the fluid.

From your reference-
Bromothymol blue is mostly used in measuring substances that would
have relatively low acidic or basic levels (near a neutral pH). It is
often used in managing the pH of pools and fish tanks, and for
measuring the presence of carbonic acid in a liquid.

A common demonstration of BTB's pH indicator properties involves
exhaling through a tube into a neutral solution of BTB. As carbon
dioxide is absorbed from the breath into the solution, forming
carbonic acid, the solution changes color from green to yellow. Thus,
BTB is commonly used in middle school science classes to demonstrate
that the more that muscles are used, the greater the CO2 output.

it's also used for testing radiator leaks at $50 per quart as opposed to $5.
 
So I took it out of the garage, moved it to my work apron out back,
had it running for about 7 minutes. Opened the bottle and took a good
whiff...

What does it mean if it smells like exhaust...? :(


Nothing good.
 
you can use it either way. if the system is bubbling, then the gasket
is leaking. and don't need a reagent to tell you that!

Not necessarily true.
If you have air trapped in the system it will bubble like crazy as it
warms up, and sometimes even blow all the antifreeze back out -
without there being ANY leakage in the system
otoh, if you use the reagent to test the coolant, and you can, then you
have your result.

But if the PH of the coolant is "off" in the first place, the reagent
will show you have a leak when you don't, using it your way.

Using it the right way, it won't lie.
it's also used for testing radiator leaks at $50 per quart as opposed to $5.

Nothing stopping you (or me) from buying it for $5 instead of $50 and
still using it the right way - to tetect CO2, not coolant pH.
 
Not necessarily true.
If you have air trapped in the system it will bubble like crazy as it
warms up, and sometimes even blow all the antifreeze back out -
without there being ANY leakage in the system

ok, so i'm guilty of presuming that we're not talking novices here and
that we know how to bleed a cooling system.

But if the PH of the coolant is "off" in the first place,

"off"??? not unless you've got a beer pump attached to your cooling
system.

the reagent
will show you have a leak when you don't, using it your way.

Using it the right way, it won't lie.

not true. early stage head gasket can persist for quite some time. one
of my cars took roughly a year and ~30k miles between the overheating
event that initiated failure and the exhaust venting into the coolant
badly enough to be visible. and even then, it was only a small amount,
and only when hot, not cold. all this would have been resolved with a
pH test early on. if you're worried about a false positive, change the
coolant, and re-test a couple of weeks later.

Nothing stopping you (or me) from buying it for $5 instead of $50 and
still using it the right way - to tetect CO2, not coolant pH.

a decrease in coolant pH is /caused/ by COâ‚‚. i thought the cites were
self explanatory. would you like more explanation?
 
ok, so i'm guilty of presuming that we're not talking novices here and
that we know how to bleed a cooling system.

And they don't know how to check for a damaged head gasket - RIGHT!!!
Bleeding the cooling system requires different procedures on different
cars. Some can be extremely difficult to "burp". Ever bleed the
cooling system on a Renault R12????
And the Supra M engine is a BIT more difficult than some, although
much simpler than many others. On some you need to remove a hose - and
different hoses on different vehicles. Some need filling through the
expansion bottle - all kinds of different ways -

We ARE talking to novices in this group
"off"??? not unless you've got a beer pump attached to your cooling
system.

In many cases a 50% mixture of tap water and glycol is very high in pH
- and depending on the water source, it can be very low. Low PH (acid
condition) causes corrosion in the cooling system. High pH
(alkalinity) causes scale build-up in the cooling system. Correct
buffering of the coolant prevents both problems - and ONLY a correctly
buffered system can accurately be checked for leaks by testing the
coolant with Bromothymol Blue.
On the other hand, using it in a "sniff tester" as described to
detect CO2 in the air coming off the top of the rad you can accurately
determine if there is a combustion leak into the cooling system,
regardless of the pH of the system before the test.
not true. early stage head gasket can persist for quite some time. one
of my cars took roughly a year and ~30k miles between the overheating
event that initiated failure and the exhaust venting into the coolant
badly enough to be visible. and even then, it was only a small amount,
and only when hot, not cold. all this would have been resolved with a
pH test early on. if you're worried about a false positive, change the
coolant, and re-test a couple of weeks later.

I'd be much more worried about a false negative - and leakage on a
COLD engine is much more common than on a hot engine, when it is
intermittent.Starting with a cold engine, with the sniffer tester
connected and run untill warm under a light load (fast idle in drive
on an automatic, or A/C on and headlights on high beam) will catch
even a small elusive leak with fair reliability.
And changing the antifreeze to resolve the uncertainty is totally
un-necessary (even in your scenario), Antifreeze is routinely
"reconditioned" by running ithrough a filter and the pH corrected by
the addition of buffering agents. Antifreeze is a hazardous waste
which must be properly disposed of - and it is also not inexpensive.
Recycling the coolant is the responsible thing to do - as well as the
economical thing to do.

When an engine warms up, the parts expand and the clearances decrease,
causing many minor coolant leaks, both internal and external, to
temporarily stop with the engine at operating temperatures.
 
And they don't know how to check for a damaged head gasket - RIGHT!!!
Bleeding the cooling system requires different procedures on different
cars. Some can be extremely difficult to "burp". Ever bleed the
cooling system on a Renault R12????
And the Supra M engine is a BIT more difficult than some, although
much simpler than many others. On some you need to remove a hose - and
different hoses on different vehicles. Some need filling through the
expansion bottle - all kinds of different ways -

We ARE talking to novices in this group

well /i'm/ not.

In many cases a 50% mixture of tap water and glycol is very high in pH
- and depending on the water source, it can be very low. Low PH (acid
condition) causes corrosion in the cooling system. High pH
(alkalinity) causes scale build-up in the cooling system. Correct
buffering of the coolant prevents both problems - and ONLY a correctly
buffered system can accurately be checked for leaks by testing the
coolant with Bromothymol Blue.

two things:

1. you shouldn't be filling the cooling system with tap water in the
first place. it should be de-ionized/distilled. for precisely the
contamination/corrosion reasons you cite.

2. who is supposed to be buffering these solutions in the first place?
and for what conditions??? certainly not the end user. this is not a
"one size fits all" situation.

On the other hand, using it in a "sniff tester" as described to
detect CO2 in the air coming off the top of the rad you can accurately
determine if there is a combustion leak into the cooling system,
regardless of the pH of the system before the test.

yes in theory, but in practice, only in the later stages of gasket
leakage. at which point, it's pretty danged obvious what's going on anyway.

I'd be much more worried about a false negative

i'm not. just change the coolant. it's a few bucks.

- and leakage on a
COLD engine is much more common than on a hot engine,

untrue. early stage leakage is usually only manifest when hot. we want
to catch this thing as quickly as possible.

when it is
intermittent.Starting with a cold engine, with the sniffer tester
connected and run untill warm under a light load (fast idle in drive
on an automatic, or A/C on and headlights on high beam) will catch
even a small elusive leak with fair reliability.

indeed, but later stages. in which case, bubbles in the coolant should
be making the problem obvious anyway.

And changing the antifreeze to resolve the uncertainty is totally
un-necessary (even in your scenario), Antifreeze is routinely
"reconditioned" by running ithrough a filter and the pH corrected by
the addition of buffering agents.

you can't recover ethylene glycol by filtering dude. sorry. and buffer
with what? buffering with inorganics increases corrosion rates.

Antifreeze is a hazardous waste
which must be properly disposed of - and it is also not inexpensive.

c'mon clare. it's $7 or $8 for a gallon. anyone not prepared to spend
that on an accurate diagnosis needs more than their gaskets testing.

Recycling the coolant is the responsible thing to do - as well as the
economical thing to do.

that might be something available to those working in large shops, but
not the man on the street. besides, the "environmental hazard" is
primarily to biosystems like dogs who like the sweet taste. while more
so, its toxicity is not unlike that of alcohol. mmm.

When an engine warms up, the parts expand and the clearances decrease,
causing many minor coolant leaks, both internal and external, to
temporarily stop with the engine at operating temperatures.

not head gaskets - other way around. restricted linear expansion causes
them to bow in the middle - hence warping. that's why it's usually the
middle pistons where the leakage is evident. and if you can see
bubbling when cold, the gasket is already pretty far gone. [maybe your
experience is skewed - most shops only get to see late stage leakage
since owners usually never notice early and thus never take their
vehicles in.]
 
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:43:59 -0400, clare wrote:


That's what I thought you were going to say...


Delay this fix and you'll get a nice crusty spot of corrosion on the block
where the breach is. At that point, the new gasket may or may not hold;
it's a crapshoot.
 
Delay this fix and you'll get a nice crusty spot of corrosion on the block
where the breach is. At that point, the new gasket may or may not hold;
it's a crapshoot.

Boy, you two are just FULL of wonderful news!

The car has been sitting since Thursday. I have a very small garage so I'm
looking to see if a friend of mine has a space I can use. How long can I
wait before ripping it apart?

Once I get it apart, is there any suggested limit where I need to get it
back together by? I understand "ASAP" is the best, but...
 
well /i'm/ not.



two things:

1. you shouldn't be filling the cooling system with tap water in the
first place. it should be de-ionized/distilled. for precisely the
contamination/corrosion reasons you cite.

NEVER use de-ionized water in a cooling system. Distilled is great -
and most tap water is acceptable. Virtually every dealership in the
country uses tap water.
2. who is supposed to be buffering these solutions in the first place?
and for what conditions??? certainly not the end user. this is not a
"one size fits all" situation.
The garage when it is installed by a garage. I have never had the pH
come out where it belongs with a 50% mix of antifreeze and ANY water.
Many times it's been close, but USUALLY the pH is too high.
yes in theory, but in practice, only in the later stages of gasket
leakage. at which point, it's pretty danged obvious what's going on anyway.


i'm not. just change the coolant. it's a few bucks.

A false negative on many cars will cause engine damage before you
realize you have a problem. ONE OUNCE of glycol in the crankcase of a
Ford 3.8 can trash the bearings.
untrue. early stage leakage is usually only manifest when hot. we want
to catch this thing as quickly as possible.
I've been a mechanic since 1969 - and I've seen more engines leak
coolant only when cold than only when hot. The only reason you see it
more when hot is because when hot the system is under pressure.
Pressurize the cold system and generally it leaks more, and sooner,
than when hot.
indeed, but later stages. in which case, bubbles in the coolant should
be making the problem obvious anyway.



you can't recover ethylene glycol by filtering dude. sorry. and buffer
with what? buffering with inorganics increases corrosion rates.

It is done ALL THE TIME. The coolant is filtered and a buffering agent
is added to bring the pH back to spec.
c'mon clare. it's $7 or $8 for a gallon. anyone not prepared to spend
that on an accurate diagnosis needs more than their gaskets testing.

Up here it's generally $14 per gallon. to the man on the street.
Recycling the coolant is the responsible thing to do - as well as the
economical thing to do.

that might be something available to those working in large shops, but
not the man on the street. besides, the "environmental hazard" is
primarily to biosystems like dogs who like the sweet taste. while more
so, its toxicity is not unlike that of alcohol. mmm.

When an engine warms up, the parts expand and the clearances decrease,
causing many minor coolant leaks, both internal and external, to
temporarily stop with the engine at operating temperatures.

not head gaskets - other way around. restricted linear expansion causes
them to bow in the middle - hence warping. that's why it's usually the
middle pistons where the leakage is evident. and if you can see
bubbling when cold, the gasket is already pretty far gone. [maybe your
experience is skewed - most shops only get to see late stage leakage
since owners usually never notice early and thus never take their
vehicles in.]

My experience may well be skewed a bit, because I've wrenched
professionally for many years. (with many of those years on Toyotas)
Many head gasket leaks have absolutely nothing to do with restricted
linear expansion and bowing, and everything to do with gasket material
failure, corrosion, head bolt torque, and many other causes.
On the "M" engine, in particular, early head gasket failures were
attributed to shearing of the gasket because of the large differential
in expansion rates between the aluminum head and the cast head. Toyota
got that problem pretty well sorted out by the time the 4M engine was
introduced. Most of the 3M engines were also good - but the 2M (Early
Crown ) engines had a significant head gasket problem.
From 4M on up, the ONLY head gasket failures I ever saw were due to
uverheating from blown hoses, leaky rads, and sticking aftermarker
thermostats.

Our dealership saw just about every vehicle we serviced a minimum of
twice a year - and the vast majority 3 or 4 times a year. We did not
have many failures of any sort.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
13,974
Messages
67,602
Members
7,467
Latest member
rmacagni

Latest Threads

Back
Top