Steve, in a C&D H1 mag review several years back (I don't have the issue anymore), I clearly recall
the author outlining the proceedure for using the brake as a means of redistributing the power to
all four corners. The scenario was such that would put the vehicle in a position where opposite
corners were not in contact with the ground (rock crawling). This was demonstrated to them by an
AMG rep who accompianied them throughout the test to help show off the vehicles capabilities. Maybe
that's a weakness of the torsen, I don't know.
To be honest, I don't know if the milspec HMMWVs
still have the Gleasons or not...my understanding
of that goes wayyyyy back ;-) As far as brake
application to get things mixed around, that
sounds right to me. Now, just to mix all *that*
together, one of the claimed advantages to the
Gleason Torsens (again, going wayyyy back here)
was that they'd actuate/redistribute even if the
"slipping" wheel had zero traction, eg one wheel
was up in free air, like your rock-crawling
scenario. The other lockers/LSDs (Detroit Locker
is the only one that comes to mind at the moment)
of the time required *some* degree of
drag/friction on the slipping wheel, or they
wouldn't function...which suggests that some
brake action in that kind of situation would be
good medicine.