RSX Type S vs. WRX - which to buy

J

Jack

List,

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Suggestions, please...

Thanks.
 
List,

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Suggestions, please...

If you are in an area where it snows get the Subie if you are in an
area where they never see snow the decision is harder.
You cannot go wrong with either car. Both are well made and very
durable. I think you get more bang for your buck with the WRX which is
what I drive. But I have snow to contend with. I have the 5 spd in my
WRX.
Personally I don't like FWD but I'm in the minority on that. I'd still
go for the Subie which is what I did but both cars are excellent.
 
FWIW... I live where there is never any snow. Further, I've never really liked front-wheel drive cars (and, I've owned several). Now, I'm sort of leaning toward an all-wheel drive model to eliminate that front-wheel spin when leaving the line on wet days; and, to eliminate the torque steer that they all have to some degree.

Acura is so smooth and refined. WRX seems much less so. Still in a quandary... : > ((

--

Jack
jack.beale"a"att.net


List,

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Suggestions, please...

If you are in an area where it snows get the Subie if you are in an
area where they never see snow the decision is harder.
You cannot go wrong with either car. Both are well made and very
durable. I think you get more bang for your buck with the WRX which is
what I drive. But I have snow to contend with. I have the 5 spd in my
WRX.
Personally I don't like FWD but I'm in the minority on that. I'd still
go for the Subie which is what I did but both cars are excellent.
 
You are aware that only the WRX STI comes with the 6-speed, the standard WRX only gets a 5-speed
List,

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Suggestions, please...

Thanks.
 
Hi,
Just look at the torque, forgetting Hp rating for a moment.
My nephew has Honda vs. my son's Subie. We live in COLD
climate. Summer or winter, Subie wins hands down.
Tony
 
Hi,
Just look at the torque, forgetting Hp rating for a moment.
My nephew has Honda vs. my son's Subie. We live in COLD
climate. Summer or winter, Subie wins hands down.
Tony

Sure I live in a cold area as well and we get a lot of snow but if the
guy lives in Florida or someplace where it's always hot it won't be as
much of a factor.
Both cars are decent and atthe moment I'd have to give the nod to the
acura on resale value but I've driven the Acura and I didn't care for
it. The WRX is great except for the oversensitive ABS which I really
hate.
 
C,

Yep...! My mistake in writing the first message...

--

Jack

You are aware that only the WRX STI comes with the 6-speed, the standard WRX only gets a 5-speed
List,

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Suggestions, please...

Thanks.
 
Don't be too hasty with your evaluation. The performance numbers (acceleration) show that the Acura RSX "S" is less than a half-second behind the WRX 0 - 30; 0 - 60; 0 - 1/4 mile... I know... it surprised me too...

--

Jack


nl said:
Acura is so smooth and refined. WRX seems much > less so. Still in a
quandary... : > ((

True. You can't really compare the two. RSX (in with
any engine tuning) is more comparable to 2.5TS
And even then 2.5TS/RS produces more torque at lower RPMs, I think. With
equal tires WRX would just blow RSX out of the water. Even TS would blow RSX
out of the water on the abovementioned water :)
 
Hi Jack!

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

I've driven both in "D Stock" trim on an autocross course. The Acura
felt considerably lighter and sportier than my WRX wagon. I was a bit
faster in my rex, but then I'm used to it; in general it seems that
the Acura will out perform the WRX at autocross, all else being equal.
That said, they are very different cars, with very different goals in
life. If you rarely haul more than a couple sacks of groceries, and
never plan on taking it off of paved roads, the Acura is a fine
choice, and a really neat car. If you like dirt roads, drive in snow
in the winter, and/or need more utility in a car, AND still like to be
able to rip up the asphalt now -n- then, look no further than the WRX.
I routinely carry two 16.5ft canoes on mine (a wagon, remember), with
a weeks worth of fishing and camping gear in the back, over roads that
barely qualify as such, and frequently at a pretty fair pace
(washboards are best served at speed). The WRX will accommodate me and
the Ms, two teenaged kids, and three largish dogs without problem
(well, the kids get drooled on, but hey, not _my_ problem ;-), and
will comfortably tow a small (3 motorcycle or equivalent) trailer.
Ya just flat can't do that with the Acura, or any other "sports" car
that I'm familiar with.
The Acura is (IMO) a better looking ride, and will probably hold a
higher resale value. Alas, they are very popular with car thieves,
which somewhat increases the odds that you won't have one to re-sell.
So. In the end it mostly depends on what you want to do with the car,
and that's something you have to decide.
My $.02, and worth every penny!

ByeBye! S.

Steve Jernigan KG0MB
Laboratory Manager
Microelectronics Research
University of Colorado
(719) 262-3101
 
Jack said:
About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type
"S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.
Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight
and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, > something well-mannered
that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and
drove, both - can't make up my mind...!
Suggestions, please...

Test drive them on a twisty gravel road, this should be enough to
convince you to get the WRX. Of course if you're on the highway all the
time and never drive on bumby twisty roads you could just get the Acura.
 
powertrain said:
Test drive them on a twisty gravel road, this should be enough to
convince you to get the WRX. Of course if you're on the highway all the
time and never drive on bumby twisty roads you could just get the Acura.

Well, most likely if the numbers mentioned before are true, then the speeds
are really too similar to matter unless you redline all the time. In that
case alone you have a little bit of a jump with the WRX (Car and Diver's
5.4 0-60 for the Rex Versus the 6.3 for the Acura...from what it sounds
like, the gap stays about like that the rest of the way but I'm not sure).
Probably not enough of a difference to base a purchase on unless you are
buying one to specifically race the other.

Everyone else had good points, what with the getting out of town trips, any
roads that aren't perfect tarmac, bad weather, etc in favor of the WRX,
also.

I'll have to disagree with S on the looks, though. Even the new face of the
WRX (which I like a lot less than ol' bug-eyes) is more appealing than the
Acura in my eyes. :)

Resale value is based on your area. You'll get a lot better resale for the
Subie than you will for the Acura up here. Can't speak for your area.

Most importantly you mentioned something that you'll look forward to driving
day-to-day and fun to drive. For what it's worth, I had a huge grin on my
face when I first drove my WRX, a grin that I still get on my face nearly
every time I drive it. It still seems new and impressive to me and is more
and more fun to drive as the days go by. I absolutely love it and it gets
better all the time. That, in my eyes, is more important than time slips.
 
Hi,
Bigger disc, pads, steel braided line, master cylinder brace, etc.
You can get a kit.
Tony
 
About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an
Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive.
Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving
day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Being based in the UK, I'm not sure what type of Honda the Acura RSX
Type "S" is, but unless it's a Civic Type 'R' equivalent it's
obviously nowhere near as sporting as a Rex. Question is, do you
really want a car as sporting as a Rex?

In terms of driveability, I assume that the Honda has
front-wheel-drive and is therefore an understeerer. We all know that
the only fwd car which is genuinely fun to drive is the Mini (the real
one, not the fat BMW thing).

The Scooby's all-wheel-drive also tends to understeer, but nowhere
near as badly as most fwd cars and it has the advantage of bullet-like
acceleration out of corners because of its massive traction and lack
of torque steer. (The awd is fabulous on dry tarmac and great in the
wet, but don't expect it to do much for you off road or in deep snow
because of the low ground clearance and unsuitable wheels and tyres.)

One of the great attractions of the Rex is that it is still a genuine
drivers' car. Some find it quirky and demanding and learning to get
the most out of it - whether pushing or cruising - takes more than a
short test drive. (I assume we're talking about the manual here....if
you want an auto, this isn't the car for you.)

Subarus are pretty much bullet-proof as far as reliability is
concerned. The Rex is quick, though, and if driven properly it will
eat consumables like brakes and tyres at a great rate. Ham footed -
and fisted - people can also go through clutches - and even gearboxes
- fairly quickly.

Essentially, if you have to ask the question, this probably isn't the
car for you. Stick to the old man's Honda.

David Betts
(e-mail address removed)
 
Hi David, All!

Being based in the UK, I'm not sure what type of Honda the Acura RSX
Type "S" is, but unless it's a Civic Type 'R' equivalent it's
obviously nowhere near as sporting as a Rex. Question is, do you
really want a car as sporting as a Rex?

I don't know where the Integra R falls in the Acura/Honda family tree,
but it is definitely a sports car! Lotsa "factory" performance goodies
on it that would cost a bundle to retrofit.
It occurs to me that we may be talking about different cars here; the
Acura I have driven was a 2000 or 2001 Integra type R, the newer RSX-S
might be something else entirely . . .
The Scooby's all-wheel-drive also tends to understeer, but nowhere
near as badly as most fwd cars and it has the advantage of bullet-like
acceleration out of corners because of its massive traction and lack
of torque steer. (The awd is fabulous on dry tarmac and great in the
wet, but don't expect it to do much for you off road or in deep snow
because of the low ground clearance and unsuitable wheels and tyres.)

Here I will respectfully disagree, subject to the above caveat. In DS
trim, which allows the use of DOT approved racing tires such as the
Hoosiers or Kumho Victoracers, the Integra exhibited perceptibly less
understeer than my WRX wagon. I think what confuses the issue here is
that understeer feels different in an AWD car. A FWD car _feels_ like
the front is pushing to the outside when it lets go. The AWD (in the
WRX anyway) does not give the impression of push as much, rather all
four tires slide, while the car carves a nicely arced turn, the radius
of which increases as you add throttle. It feels fast, and is huge
fun, but eventually you come to realize that it isn't the fast way
around the course. I believe that a good part of the Integras neutral
handling can be attributed to the performance oriented suspension
package. These components are legal in "stock" class on the Integra,
as they are "factory equipped", whereas the same level of preparation
on my WRX would move the car into a "Prepared" (Duh ;-) class.

There are two additional issues with the WRX that make it a more
difficult car to manage when pushed to it's limits on an autocross.
The first is the notorious turbo lag, and believe me, the rex at
6500ft elevation is a real pooch until the turbo spools up. I know, I
know; exhaust changes, aftermarket BOV, yadda, yadda; we're talking
"Stock" class here. The second glitch is the WRXes (at least mine, tho
other drivers seem have the same gripe) reluctance to downshift into
first gear. Slow turns followed by fast slaloms are real tests of
patience; you want to downshift, but also hope to finish the day with
your first gear intact so you can drive home, and get to work on
Monday. Exiting the slow turn in second and working the clutch hard to
keep the turbo spinning seems to be the general response.

Oh, and you _can_ take the mighty rex offroad with a little care.
Obviously it's never gonna be a serious 4X4, but check out
<http://chester.uccs.edu/wrx/offroad/> for some fotos. And since I
know someone will ask; Lincoln Gulch Road in the White River National
Forest east of Aspen CO, on a fishin' trip last fall. And the fishing
at the lake in the last foto (Grizzly Lake) was good, thanx. It snowed
a bit on the hike out.
One of the great attractions of the Rex is that it is still a genuine
drivers' car. Some find it quirky and demanding and learning to get
the most out of it - whether pushing or cruising - takes more than a
short test drive.

Absolutely true. The car is easy (maybe too easy) to drive really
fast. OTOH, it is very difficult to get that last 1% (the 1% that
separates the winners from the rest of us) out of it, for reasons
mentioned above. Even very skilled pilots have difficulties
maintaining consistency.
(I assume we're talking about the manual here....if
you want an auto, this isn't the car for you.)

I will mention that a WRX wagon driver who routinely finishes towards
the upper end of the DS class in our division drives an automatic; he
tells me that he keeps the gas pedal on the floor and uses his left
foot on the brake to modulate his speed. Whatever the reason, he gets
around faster than me by a fair bit.

Don't misunderstand; I love my WRX, but in all honesty I have given up
on it as an autocross car, and have gone back to driving my well
sorted old MR2 in CSP. I still consistently finish mid pack, but the
tail-happy little mister is simply more fun to autocross, and in the
end that's what it's all about.

ByeBye! S.

Steve Jernigan KG0MB
Laboratory Manager
Microelectronics Research
University of Colorado
(719) 262-3101
 
Tony Hwang said:
Hi,
Bigger disc, pads, steel braided line, master cylinder brace, etc.
You can get a kit.
Tony

Does this require going to 17" wheels or could you stay
with 16"s?
 
Don't misunderstand; I love my WRX, but in all honesty I have given up
on it as an autocross car, and have gone back to driving my well
sorted old MR2 in CSP. I still consistently finish mid pack, but the
tail-happy little mister is simply more fun to autocross, and in the
end that's what it's all about.

As I understand it, what you refer to as 'autocross' is what I would
refer to as as 'auto test'......ie manoevring around pylons on tarmax,
not grass-track racing. I would have thought a Rex would be pretty
useless at this as you need to slide the car around precisely at
relatively low speeds. Awd makes it too hard to break traction. In the
UK we use small front-wheel-drivers or rear-wheel-drivers like Minis
and Sprites. Much quicker than anything else, except the cut-down
specials.

David Betts
(e-mail address removed)
 
Hi David, All!



I don't know where the Integra R falls in the Acura/Honda family tree,
but it is definitely a sports car! Lotsa "factory" performance goodies
on it that would cost a bundle to retrofit.
It occurs to me that we may be talking about different cars here; the
Acura I have driven was a 2000 or 2001 Integra type R, the newer RSX-S
might be something else entirely . . .

ByeBye! S.

Steve Jernigan KG0MB
Laboratory Manager
Microelectronics Research
University of Colorado
(719) 262-3101

The Acura RSX Type-S is one step below a 2003 Honda Integra Type-R in
Europe. It has 20 less horsepower and not quite as good a suspension
or brakes and no LSD. The Acura RSX Type-S FP is basically a Honda
Integra Type-R with 20 less horsepower and no LSD. One option you're
forgetting is importing a Honda Integra Type-R from Europe. It'll
cost about the same as a fully loaded WRX.
http://www.evolutionimports.com

JaySee
 
At a lapping day last weekend (http://www.shannonville.com/) I was roughly
evenly matched with two RSX Type S's in my WRX wagon. Keep in mind the RSX
is a lot lighter, so even if the WRX in theory will accelerate faster
(provided you're on boost the whole time), the RSX gets around the track
just as quickly, and with less wear on tires and brakes. Next time I'm
hoping for rain.

On the way home, after loading all of my crap back into the car, and having
room for a lot more, I took some fun dirt roads, and nary an RSX in sight in
the rear-view.

I'm in Ottawa, and ski a lot, so the unbeatable performance in snow (and
never having to use the parking brake to get sideways) is invaluable.

Andy.



and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll
look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both -
can't make up my mind...!
 
Group,

To answer my own message...

Thanks for all the great input... Today I ordered the car...

Had the opportunity to look at both cars side-by-side and to drive them in succession. The RSX-S is certainly quick and as smooth as a glass. The WRX is fast and gives you that 'pushed-back-in-the-seat' feeling when you tach it up...

I'd say that the Acura is like a Swiss watch - the WRX, like a Swiss army knife.

Since I don't have snow to contend with, and I drive it mostly in the city and on freeways, I chose the Acura RSX-S.

--

Jack Beale
jack.beale"at"att.net




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




List,

About to spend that hard-earned cash on either a new Acura RSX Type "S", or an Impreza WRX - both 6-spd.

Want something quick from corner to corner, fast down the straight and fun to drive. Maybe most importantly, something well-mannered that I'll look forward to driving day-to-day, everyday. Looked at, and drove, both - can't make up my mind...!

Suggestions, please...

Thanks.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
13,967
Messages
67,563
Members
7,449
Latest member
Jagaba

Latest Threads

Back
Top