Clutch action of 5-speed "feels different" in Subaru Outback - reported by two friends, what is up?

B

BeamGuy

I have two friends with a Subaru Outback 5-speed, and both complain most about the
clutch action. Both have driven 5-speeds all their lives. One friend owns one and had
the clutch replaced once, but still complain that shifting "just has never felt natural and
always requires me to think about it". Another is in the market for a new car, but ruled
out the 5-speed due to a similar experience.

Just what is up here?

Is the difference simply that the outback has a heavy duty drive train, and if so are there
other Subaru models that would feel more like a street car?
 
BeamGuy said:
I have two friends with a Subaru Outback 5-speed, and both complain most about the
clutch action. Both have driven 5-speeds all their lives. One friend owns one and had
the clutch replaced once, but still complain that shifting "just has never felt natural and
always requires me to think about it". Another is in the market for a new car, but ruled
out the 5-speed due to a similar experience.

Just what is up here?

Is the difference simply that the outback has a heavy duty drive train, and if so are there
other Subaru models that would feel more like a street car?

I don't gripe much about the Subaru, but I would
tend to agree. I've driven sticks all my life and
there is something vaguely "wrong" about the feel
of the Subaru clutch/transmission.

The 2>3 shift has always been rough unless there
is a slight pause in neutral, and it's way too
hard to get it into reverse. We had it looked
at under warranty and they said they topped up
the transmission grease to fix it. Of course, there
was no change.
 
When I push the clutch in on my 95 Legacy, by the way it feels I can almost
picture the cable running over a pully to the yoke. It seems to wobble
side-to-side, plus when it's cold it sqeaks, like some Rube Goldberg
contraption!

I think I read somewhere that Subaru have not change the design of their 5sp
MT in over 15 years. I've seen pictures of a 3rd party MT replacements for
the STi, which aside from different gear profile, has a much different
dog-teeth and syncho design.
 
Jim said:
I don't gripe much about the Subaru, but I would
tend to agree. I've driven sticks all my life and
there is something vaguely "wrong" about the feel
of the Subaru clutch/transmission.

The 2>3 shift has always been rough unless there
is a slight pause in neutral, and it's way too
hard to get it into reverse. We had it looked
at under warranty and they said they topped up
the transmission grease to fix it. Of course, there
was no change.

I agree. I really don't like the feel of the engine/trans combination.
Part of it is likely due to the engine management software and the fact
that the engine has very little drag. The engine just doesn't lose rev's
fast enough when you let off the gas to get quick shift into second
without a "bang" It also doesn't respond fast enough to provide jerk
free downshifts when trying to pass another car. My 1990 BMW325is
probably has the best feel of any car that I have driven. It is a
pleasure to drive and it heel-toe shifts perfectly. Subaru ought to take
a lesson from this car.
 
BeamGuy said:
I have two friends with a Subaru Outback 5-speed, and both complain most about the
clutch action. Both have driven 5-speeds all their lives. One friend owns one and had
the clutch replaced once, but still complain that shifting "just has never felt natural and
always requires me to think about it". Another is in the market for a new car, but ruled
out the 5-speed due to a similar experience.

Just what is up here?

Is the difference simply that the outback has a heavy duty drive train, and if so are there
other Subaru models that would feel more like a street car?

Yeah, I think you may have it there. The clutch on the Subarus tend to be
more "grabby". Perhaps the fact that this clutch has to drive two
driveshafts rather than just one means it has to be made with stronger
springs to prevent slippage. Also I get the feeling that the Subaru's
central limited-slip differential might have some role in the jerkiness one
tends to notice. Since the central diff is involved in apportioning torque
between the front and rears, a clutch disengage-reengage action might appear
to be a momentary traction loss between the front and rear, and it might
kick-in trying to balance it out again.

Yousuf Khan
 
Yousuf said:
about the


one and had


felt natural and


car, but ruled


and if so are there



Yeah, I think you may have it there. The clutch on the Subarus tend to be
more "grabby". Perhaps the fact that this clutch has to drive two
driveshafts rather than just one means it has to be made with stronger
springs to prevent slippage.

Also I get the feeling that the Subaru's
central limited-slip differential might have some role in the jerkiness one
tends to notice. Since the central diff is involved in apportioning torque
between the front and rears, a clutch disengage-reengage action might appear
to be a momentary traction loss between the front and rear, and it might
kick-in trying to balance it out again.

Unlikely, as it is true differential. It is alway mechanically providing
equal torque front and rear and there is no way the limited slip unit is
engaging under normal strait line acceleration. It may just be the
additonal driveline slop from all the additonal driveshafts and gears.
 
I agree. I really don't like the feel of the engine/trans combination.
Part of it is likely due to the engine management software and the fact
that the engine has very little drag. The engine just doesn't lose rev's
fast enough when you let off the gas to get quick shift into second
without a "bang" It also doesn't respond fast enough to provide jerk
free downshifts when trying to pass another car. My 1990 BMW325is
probably has the best feel of any car that I have driven. It is a
pleasure to drive and it heel-toe shifts perfectly. Subaru ought to take
a lesson from this car.
How? by adding more drag to the engine? <smile>
John
 
I agree. My two major complaints (after cold clutch shudder) about my 2000
OBS are what I call the "imprecise" shifting, and the tension/connection on
the clutch pedal. The gear shift feels like it has "intermediate" spots
between the actual shift locations, and I find I often miss second gear. At
times, gearing down into fourth is a bit of a problem.

My clutch pedal has become squeaky, and the dealer has failed to fix it
twice. It seems silly, but I'm going to have to speak to the service
manager about fixing something as simple as a clutch cable. Hopefully they
can fix it the third time.

Also find it strange that after major servicing, I can perceive no
difference in my clutch tension or gear shift. With my previous car, a
Civic, clutch travel was always checked at major service points, and I could
always feel that my clutch and shift had been serviced, as both would be
somewhat stiffer after servicing.

dn.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
13,888
Messages
67,364
Members
7,363
Latest member
Mustangman35

Latest Threads

Back
Top